Iran ceasefire deal terms disputed by US and Tehran

The Iran ceasefire deal has halted fighting for now, but deep disagreements between Washington and Tehran are casting doubt over what the agreement actually means.

While negotiations for a longer-term peace could begin soon, both sides are offering conflicting interpretations of key issues.

Dispute over control of the Strait of Hormuz

One of the central tensions in the Iran ceasefire deal is control of the Strait of Hormuz.

Donald Trump has insisted the ceasefire requires the immediate reopening of the strait, a critical route for global oil shipments.

However, Iran has signaled it may reopen the passage under its own military supervision. This would allow Tehran to maintain control and potentially impose fees on ships, preserving significant economic leverage.

Uranium enrichment remains unresolved

Another major point of disagreement is Iran’s nuclear program.

Tehran maintains that the Iran ceasefire deal allows it to continue enriching uranium, a stance that directly contradicts long-standing U.S. policy.

Trump has suggested a different outcome, stating that enriched uranium could be removed with U.S. involvement. Meanwhile, Pete Hegseth warned that military action remains an option if Iran does not comply.

These conflicting positions highlight how far apart both sides remain.

Lebanon conflict adds further complexity

The scope of the Iran ceasefire deal is also unclear when it comes to Lebanon.

Iran and mediators argue that the agreement should include a halt to Israeli strikes in Lebanon.

In contrast, Benjamin Netanyahu and Trump have stated that the ceasefire does not apply to operations against Hezbollah.

This disagreement risks undermining the broader peace effort.

Conflicting peace plans and unclear terms

Confusion has been compounded by multiple versions of Iran’s proposed peace framework.

Iranian officials claim the United States has agreed in principle to several major concessions, including:

• Continued Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz
• Lifting of sanctions
• Withdrawal of U.S. forces from the region
• Acceptance of uranium enrichment

These claims have been rejected by Washington, which has instead proposed its own 15-point plan.

The lack of clarity around what has actually been agreed upon continues to weaken confidence in the Iran ceasefire deal.

Negotiations continue amid uncertainty

Despite the disputes, negotiations are expected to continue, with talks potentially taking place in Pakistan.

Officials from both sides have signaled a willingness to engage, but the gap between their positions remains wide.

As a result, the Iran ceasefire deal appears less like a settled agreement and more like a temporary pause in a conflict whose core issues are still unresolved.